BEIJING AND THE DAVOS MEETING

THE DRAGON GIVES THE CABAL A WARNING. 

 

Haven't posted anything in a few weeks, but there is a reason. I'm trying real hard to get, "Patriot Spring" ready to send to Amazon. Now, if you have followed this blog site over the past 10 yrs, you know I have a tendency to "disappear" from time to time:). But, you also know, when I come across something that I think is important for folks to understand, I will pop back up on this site. So, here we go! 

The Emperor and the Cabal:

DAVOS. If you ever wanted to see a picture-perfect example of a Cabal, DAVOS is your photograph. If you don't know that much about the group, you need to. The world "elites", to include actors and academics. It's a very closed club and they hide their projects from the global public. Bottom line, they are a very powerful body that runs the world, at least they did. As of a few days ago, the Emperor has informed them, "you have a new Master!" Now, as I said in my podcast today, I would have loved to be with the Intelligence Community, and listen to the reaction of the Cabal members, once the Emperor was finished speaking to them. The fact that it was virtual means many of the members probably were texting each other as the Emperor gave them their warning. I would also bet you, the Cabal membership has a classified, above government standard, communication capability. 

"Don't Start a Cold War": 

https://www.weforum.org/events/the-davos-agenda-2021/sessions/special-address-by-g20-head-of-state-government-67e386f2d5

China is only trying to make the world a better place for all of humanity. That was the message. What do you think the members of the Cabal thought? " You better not start a Cold War with us!" That's the message I think most of the members heard. Look, the Emperor addressed this group with one goal in mind. " Get on my train.....make your money with my plan..... the West is in chaos and getting worse....you know........Do as I say!!!! Now, this DAVOS Cabal is a powerful group, but they had a weakness, a flaw in their genetic code. Wealth and Power. The lust for wealth and power drives every member of the group. Why do you think they are so secretive about who attends and what is really agreed upon. Who knows this? The same person that just addressed them, that's who! 

At the end of the video call, what do you think the Emperor did next? Did he turn to his trusted staff and say, "keep an eye on what they say and what they do. If one of them needs to be made an example, then pick someone." Does the name, "Jack Ma" ring a bell? Does Jack work for the Emperor, or does he work for the Cabal? Both you say? Well, you are probably correct, but, he is expendable, and that message was just relayed to the rest of the membership. 

What does it mean? 

Is Beijing in the middle of a long-term plan? Yes, but perhaps not in the middle. Some, like me, think that Master Plan is nearing completion. The Emperor chose his words for a reason. His message was crystal clear to the members of the cabal. It was crystal clear to the White House. The problem becomes, is Uncle Joe and K Haris up to the challenge? Sadly, my money is on the Emperor. 

 

THE "BLAME GAME"

A DANGEROUS TWIST 

Just a few days ago, I wrote this post. The short version. Large Cities are attempting to transform their Law Enforcement Agencies into a mirror of city leadership ideology. Dangerous? Yes. It's called Law Enforcement, not Ideology / Mayor's philosophy enforcement.

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7459309648379320825/6037831259752635628

It's a well-known fact, the far left, and even much of the center-left, has a low opinion of law enforcement. Just listen to them and you will hear it nearly every day of the week. So, when the President-Elect takes to the podium and makes statements about how Law Enforcement was lacking, and how if it had been BLM at the Capital, the response would have been much different, how does that take the nation forward? As a reminder, one of the biggest critics of law enforcement, was Biden's old Boss, Obama. So, today, the growing argument on the left seems to be the same story, and it's a story that will add another level, above the typical, racist undertone. It seems, the left is now saying the Capitol Police, at least some members, were supporting the protestors/rioters, trying to be impartial here! Yes, everyone knows the vast majority of law enforcement departments, at least at the state and local level, support the current President. Does that mean they would not do their jobs? Does that mean they would let the protestors into the capital building? What did the nation's intelligence agencies, the FBI, DHS indicate? Was law enforcement truly unprepared, or is the left correct? Did they sympathize with people gathered in DC? Did the rank and file of the departments sympathize, even if leadership did not? The Captial Police Chief is stepping down. Political heat! It seems if mobs riot and rip the stores and homes of DC apart, well...you know..." That's mostly Peaceful." But, let them enter the Castle, for that is what the politicians believe they work in, and all suddenly, there is hell to pay. Now, ask yourself. What is the damage here? Are we heading back to the days of Obama when all we will hear is how bad law enforcement has become? Political so-called leaders say they have had enough of Trump. Let me give you a glimpse of what happens when another, more important segment of our society says, "we have had enough!" 

The Blue Line: 

The "Blue Line". I have to wonder just how many on the left truly understand what that title references. By the way, it's actually a very...very thin blue line! All across the nation, the men and women of law enforcement realize the disdain the left has for them. Just this past year, even on Trump's watch, about every significant social crisis was placed squarely on the shoulders of those same men and women. Guilty by association.... guilty until proven innocent. Tried on social media and the MSM, with left-leaning mobs scream for a sacrifice after each event... along with stealing anything they can get their hands on because.....you know..... they're angry! The Thin Blue Line. It separates the criminals from those that love and hate law enforcement. It's the cornerstone of civil society, and it's an institution that the President-Elect is going to attack, he already has.

In the Shoes:

 If you are a police officer, not a federal agent walking into some office somewhere with your 10 dollar Starbucks coffee, but the guy or girl climbing into a patrol unit, one with the front seat crammed with equipment, what is your outlook toward your new President? If you work for a major city, and you know the leadership of that city is working hard to transform you into an ideology enforcement unit, and you know your senior leaders are taking a knee to that same leadership, what is your attitude? What is your attitude when you hear your President-Elect accusing your profession, and he's not even in office yet? Let me frame this issue in a different way. Has anyone looked at major city recruiting? Are they making their numbers? Who would go into law enforcement, for a large city that is, knowing what they are going to be up against. Now you might be able to see what I was referring to in the link I have above. Cities control who goes to the academy. Cities change the training and then cities launch their Social Justice Units into the population...........................to get eaten alive by real criminals! Then who goes and signs up for the next academy class? Look, if the day comes, and I believe it may be coming, the Thin Blue Line decides to stay home, retire, that one is already happening, just look at NYPD, what are the city leaders going to do? Call in the National Guard? What is the White House going to do? Here is the hard part, and it's the part the left is counting on. The men and women of law enforcement have a duty they are committed to. They know if they stay home, those brothers and sisters in blue that do go to work are in greater danger. The left also knows they can be shammed into showing back up. But, at the end of the day, those that call themselves leaders, that have disdain for law enforcement, count on the thin blue line just sucking it up and going to work. Confidence. That is what Biden will have. That is what the mayors of large cities will continue to have. So, let me give you all a warning. The men and women of Law Enforcement are actually human; human doing superhuman deads. But, if things get out of hand, if immoral groups like Congress and the rest of DC continues to attack the Thin Blue Line, a day may be coming that none, and I mean none of them are prepared for. You want to see the US looking like Mexico, troops doing law enforcement? Just keep it up. Keep demonizing those who are a large part of what holds society together. Keep trying to convert law enforcement into social worker units, and see what transpires. here is my last thought on the topic. Maybe, just maybe, that is exactly what the far left is trying to achieve? They believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, so, change the direction. Biden! You sir are an idiot!  

 DECAY

CRISIS IN THE US CAPITAL

A LOOK FROM THE "OUTSIDE"

What took place less than 24hr ago in Washington DC? Was it a protest against a stolen election? Was it a group of radical right-wing extreamest attacking the government? Was it a group of agitators trying to turn the event into something they wanted? Was it a setup by the "Otherside" to damage the reputation of those who support Trump? Pick a theory and you can probably run with it just by reading all the idiot posts on social media. At the end of the day, only two questions truly have any value to me. 1. Why did it happen. 2. What outcome will it have? With that said, let me dive into this event and try to give some predictive analysis of the whole issue. 

The World's view:

As the events of yesterday were taking place, I did what I always do; I watched how the world reacted. If you want to see the impact of a serious event at home, you need to pay attention to how the world responds. In the age of global, instantaneous communications, there is no other way to judge severity. What took place yesterday had three, predictable, impacts on the rest of the world. Some were nearly gitty over what they were watching, some even helped the process take place. You probably know what nation of over 1.4 billion I'm referring to. Some were frightened. The nations still see the US as the shining beacon on top of the hill. It's a group that is dwindling in numbers.  Finally, you have those who seemed to not pay attention to. Why? Because their own problems are so overwhelming, they don't have time to dwell on people who consume 3,000 calories a day, have power whenever they want it, and stores full of goods they don't even need. That group is the one I'm referring to, and that group is growing in numbers. These are the three groups I paid attention to yesterday and my perceptions of their perceptions led me to write this post. 

Decay:

 Okay, so, some nations were happy, some were worried, even frightened, and some, well, they just didn't care, but all of them had one perception in common. Decay. The word is decay and that is exactly what they all witnessed. Now, all of them understand the cornerstone of a true Democracy is the ability to have, "balanced" discourse. Many of them even attempt to have this balance, or at least they think they do, but at the end of the day, the US's version of Democracy is known to be based on freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the concept of a blind justice system. 

What took place yesterday was predictable. Disagree? Sorry, you can't defend that stance. Yesterday, the United State's Captial was the center of a protest. That is not a new event. Who protested, that was part of a new event. In the past, those who took to the streets of the US's capital were from the other end of the ideological spectrum, with the exception of the Civil War, Those who demanded more entitlement, social justice, and racial equality have been the historical masses on the streets of the US capital. What took place yesterday was different, far different. People who have a failing belief in the political process in the US came to its capital to express their anger. Were they justified? Ask them, because that is the only answer that matters when you are trying to prevent another incident. Yesterday was not about equal rights, college tuition, wars, unemployment, etc....etc....! Yesterday was far different, far more dangerous. Yesterday was about a growing percentage of the US population no longer believing in the political process. Yesterday was based on anger, and if you want to have a violent event, you have to have anger as the fuel. Yes, folks, yesterday was different. Things happened that has never happened before, and that's not just people storming into the halls of government. But, at the end of that day, what the world witnessed was decay! The US showed a fracture the world has not seen since the 60s. Some were ecstatic over what they saw, and it's that category that worries me. what happens when there is blood in the water.  Historically, what has been the response of a nation whose government is unstable? A government in trouble turns to what? Yep. A distraction, and the more dangerous the trouble, the bigger the required distraction. How many wars have been fought as a distraction? I think you get my point. Yesterday, the US put blood in the water, and the sharks can smell blood from miles away, in this case, halfway around the world! 

Something that caught my eye:

One thing I learned a long time ago was to watch the world's money when something big was happening. When money makers get scared, they tend to hide. If something is taking place they can't control, they tend to retreat, wait to see just how bad the event is. If you can prove me wrong, please try. Hours into the crisis in DC, I happened to remember to check the markets. Up and 300+ and holding, and it held all day. How? How could such a visually dramatic event be taking place, an Arab Spring level event, and the markets were making money? I even posed the question on social media. DC had political leaders running for their lives, like the fall of the Roman Senate, and the markets were making money? Does anyone find that a bit..........odd? Now, I know some economic nerd academic might chime in and give a dissertation on the topic, but I look at historical data, not the words of a person who feeds pigeons on their lunch break. The US was in a full-blown crisis yesterday, and the markets pushed on as if their phones and TV's were off. It's a global market, yes. But, who controls it? How could the global news be that dramatic and the markets ignore the whole thing. By the way, as I write this, stock futures are up! 

Here comes an ugly question, but one that most people are already talking about, and have been for years. Who runs the US? Is it political leadership? Does a bureaucratic machine, wired by large corporations keep any political so-called leader on strings as they show up in DC? Ever read the controversy over, "Campaign Finance Reform?" With all the rumors of a Cabal in DC, doesn't the old saying, "where there's smoke, there's fire" come into play? " I'm going to DC and I am going to change what is going on.......I'm going to drain the swamp....go after the corruption...etc....etc." But, when all of them get there, " You will be assimilated!" The Borg / Cabal / consumes them, and if they can't be assimilated, think Trump, then they become the primary target. Who of the people who showed up in DC yesterday doesn't believe that Trump's reelection was stolen? It doesn't matter if you believe, you need to look at the world through the glasses of those who were there. To them, the nation is run by a Cabal, a group of Beltway Bandits, an international group so powerful, the markets didn't move yesterday. It was as if the Borg knew what was going to happen, and thus, the markets didn't react. 

Side Note: The number of Chinese government-owned corporations inside the Borg is nearly the controlling factor. In fact, it may be the controlling factor. Ever read, "Unrestricted Warfare?" 

Where is this going:

What are the second and third-order effects of yesterday? What proportion of my favorite issue, The law of unintended consequences, will impact the inbound Biden Team? You see, the world knows, there are no clam waters ahead for the US or the US economy. The US's enemies /competitors / also understand the only thing keeping people from truly turning on each other in the US is the economy. The lights come on, the stores have goods, the doctors have medicine. Life is aggravating, but life is not in jeopardy. Change that, and you get the US to fall into a Mad Max movie. If that is the perception of the US's enemies, then someone better be looking for the indicators. If yesterday is a glimpse into the Biden administrations' future, well, I will stop there. Decay. In the most simplest terms I can use, what the world witnessed yesterday was the continuing decay of the beacon on the hill. Discourse is the cornerstone, but if that discourse is not balanced, it all flies apart. There is an old saying, "The flame that burns twice as hot, burns half as long." Maybe our beacon has been too bright? No calm waters Uncle Joe....no calm waters. 

 THE "MILITARIZATION" OF US LAW ENFORCEMENT

IS THAT REALLY WHAT IS TAKING PLACE? 

Before I run down this rabbit hole, let me give a disclaimer here. I spent 32 years of my life with the United States Military, as well as 10 years as a civilian Police Officer in two major cities. I just wanted you to understand those facts in case you find this post slanted. I'll try not to let that happen, but perceptions rule the 21st Century.

For well over a year now, the US media, both corporate and social, has addressed the perception of, " The Militarization of US Law Enforcement!" Police Officers that dress like the military, carry military-style weapons, and even respond, in some circumstances, in military-based vehicles. Is it true? Yes! Surprised I said that? Well, I told you I would try to keep this objective. Now, was some of this transformation necessary? Yes. Was it all based on the adjustments made for 9-11? Yes. Where some of these transformations based upon the changing world that we all live in? Yes. Are criminals more capable than in the past? Yes. Is that due to the number and types of guns on the streets? Yes. Do gun laws work? No! Don't believe me? Take a look at third world nations and see if you spot criminals without guns. If that's not enough for you, take a look at the city of Chicago.....gun laws at every streetcorner, and still killings in mass. Look, here is my point. Law Enforcement in the US, and really, all over the world, has changed. 

The questions become:

 1. does change come too quickly? 

2. Was the change based upon sound logic?

 3. Did the public have a vote in the change? 

Now, those are the standard questions that should have been addressed, but let me add a level to this discussion that is, in my opinion, overlooked. 

4. Who is upset with the changes? 

5. Most importantly.......... is someone using this perception issue to their advantage? 

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/city-reports-allege-militarized-mindset-in-austin-police-academy/

I read this story yesterday, and I have to tell you, it upset me. It's my opinion, I know, my objectiveness slips right here, that once again, an emotional issue is being hijacked by some group that has an agenda. " Unfund the Police...... Cops are the enforces of the Fascist"....and on and on....! The people who scream about the actions of Law Enforcement the most are the same ones who want to change nearly everything that the US currently operates from. The goal? Well, first the goal is to get those who may not believe everything the movement is saying to believe them, or at least listen to them. The trick? You take a small slice of reality, an event, and you weaponize that event into a perception that people may grab onto. " The US has systemic racism!"  A statement based upon the actions of law enforcement in isolated incidents. Look up the stats, ISOLATED! Whoops! Objectivity... I know..I know! 

Foundation: 

What is the cornerstone of any civil society? Law....Rules..... and the ability to enforce those Laws and Rules in a manner the public agrees to accept. You see, you can write laws, give speeches, and make promises all day long, it's what politicians do. But, when the public agrees to live by those laws, they expect them to be enforced with balance and honor. Honor, a four-letter word in the political arena. So, if you are out to change the power structure, you must attack the credibility of those who are in power. You must paint a picture of what that current leadership is doing to suppress and harm society. One historical way you can achieve that goal is to take an incident and make it your battle cry. Think Arab Spring and a guy who set himself on fire. Or, in the case of the US, think of Floyd. Believe me. that last statement was "Objective." 

The instrument of governance tasked with keeping public order is law enforcement. In order to create social disorder, you must damage, even destroy law enforcement...oh.. and by the way...the entire Judicial System will be the next target as well. Historically, the best way to achieve this goal is to have alliances, even if they are temporary. Outside alliance, enemies of the US, competitors at a minimum. Is there a logical link between ANTIFA and BLM? Ah yes...that alliance towards a common goal....well...not really, but it sounds good! Two would-be Kings and one throne! How's that going to work?  Anyway, the attack on law enforcement is the issue at hand, and one of the recurring themes is..... you guessed it..... the militarization of law enforcement. But wait....that's not all!!!

The real plot: 

The men and women, can we call them women anymore, or did the US congress change that too, of law enforcement are conservative by exposure. If you put on a badge and a gun, and you go work the streets for a few years, you might realize just how "Woke" your mind has become! The bottom line is, the majority of  "Cops" are realists. Here is the problem. It's impossible to take power if those who keep the public in check don't support what you are attempting. You can't have a coup with only speech writers. You can't go crack skulls unless the skullcrackers follow you. So, what needs to change? What is it that the ideological Left needs to change? If you said, the forming of law enforcement....BINGO! you go to the front of the class! If you need law enforcement to do your bidding, then you need to eliminate anyone from joining the team that doesn't think like you. Does the article I post the link to start to make sense now? Change who makes up Law Enforcement and you change what law enforcement is willing to do. Right now, the Covid 19 / China Virus / has lead to a stark reality for progressive leadership. Police Departments, Sherrif Departments saying, "no...we will not enforce the Mayor's or Governor's edicts!"  Remember, you can't do a coup with writers. 

What do I believe: 

There is a move afoot in the US to change the academies of the US. Who gets in, what are they taught and how are they told to respond. Change these things and you have changed law enforcement. Demonize the "old ways" and get the public to accept the new. The story from Austin supported a theory I've had for well over a year. I've reached out to good friends like Jaeson Jones and Derek Maltz and the three of us are going to start beating this warning drum! The institution of law enforcement is under attack, and it's not just because of a few isolated events. Those who wish to change the future of the US have identified the real target. Destroy the public's trust in the men and women of law enforcement, go after the judicial system, and the seeds of change are now planted. I believe this is what is underway in the US and I fear the goal is well thought out with clueless supporters from both political parties. I believe the large cities in the US are where this change is taking place, as those who wish to change the US see the cities as the nucleus of that change. 

Hope: 

If I am correct, and the assault on law enforcement is already well underway, then know this. There is a genetic level flaw in the plan...plot! Flyover country law enforcement will not bend to this socially engineered plan. Large cities have geographic limits. Those who live in large cities that are afraid of what it taking place are leaving. Don't believe me? Look at the ads for apartments for sale/rent in Manhatten. Look at the stories of people moving to the suburbs, countryside...."Flyover Country." The plot to change law enforcement has its limits. The federal government understands those limits and a federal government-run in an alliance with those out to change the US will attempt to force this change on the rest of the nation. Federal laws, changes to the standards of law enforcement. We see these changes already taking place at the federal and state level. some are logical, but many are not. 

Here is the reality. You can drive a nation into a crisis with a small proportion of the population. Look at Egypt in the Arab Spring. You can create a crisis, but you can't control those who get to the point, they won't listen, and they won't standstill. At some point folks, all this progressive / aggressive action reaches a point of true resistance. At that point, those with the will to stand and sacrifice, are the ones that have historically prevailed. 

Next topic. The attempt to change the other cornerstone of stability. The military! 

 

PRESIDENT HARRIS 

PROVERBS 16:18

The United States has an inbound President who is unfit for office, a man who over 75 million people didn't vote for. The US has a President that may have stolen the election, hint, he wouldn't be the first, not even the third! Worse than any of those statements, the US is about to have a President who is the most unhealthy world leader since Boris Yeltsin. With that said, Vice President Harris is one heartbeat away from being the leader of decaying world power. So, here is the question everyone keeps asking. Is she ready? Is she prepared to step in for a man everyone knows will not make it the full four years of his term? Does she have what it takes to fill Uncle Joe's shoes? Uncle Joe thinks so, at least he talks like he does, but is she truly, "ready?" If you are worried about the answer to that question, I have a history lesson you may want to contemplate. The US has a long history of truly bad, ineffective Presidents. Here is another slice of reality you may wish to think about. Making bad decisions in the 21st Century is a whole lot more dangerous than at any time in the past. One dumb statement by a US President and the whole world sees it, not just reads it, but sees it, in minutes. Yep, it's hard to hide the idiots nowadays, especially when they are political, or world leaders. But, is that the issue? is the fear the fact, reality, she will say something stupid, damaging? Look, Hank Williams Jr. said it best, "Just carrying on a family tradition!"  It's hard to find good help nowadays, and that holds doubly true for US politics. Oh, and as for those who will defend her, well, it's a poor statement on the status of the US when the answer seems to be, " She's no worse than......fill in the blank! But, is she? Is she no worse? History tells us, often dramatic changes take place with a singular event. Is President Harris a singular event? 

Left of Left? 

Is Vice President Harris, Left of Left? It seems she is more, "Left / Progressive / Liberal / Socialist....take your pick, than poor old Uncle Joe. After all, she knows her Boss use to hang out with a renowned leader of the KKK. Oh.... I know..... " He didn't know that at the time"..... or...." Ya, but Biden didn't support Bird's philosophy!"..... or did he? Sure were some strange statements made in DC when it came to legislation. Oh well....the guy got more votes than Obama, so he can't be a bigot or a racist...right? 

Let's assume Vice President Harris wakes up one morning to the news the President has had another stroke, the 4th I think, in his sleep. He is unable to execute the duties of the office. The Process starts, a process that is planned in great detail, that culminates with President Harris. The Process is ready, but is she? Was Johnson ready? By the way, LBJ was a lowlife POS! All you have to do is read ladybird's book, and you get to see what a real dirtbag Mr. Social Reform truly was. So, yes, the process is in place, but what about the person? Does she truly understand she is not only just one heartbeat away from the Oval Office but a weak and dying heartbeat at that? Now, ask yourself the next logical question, what is she ready for? 

Does a person who was blown out in the first round of the Democratic selection process have a gameplan? Is it the same gameplan as the old man Boss she serves under? Does she have a, "It's my time", philosophy? Is she power-hungry? Okay, that's an easy one. Is there anyone who is not power-hungry that runs for President? So, let's assume now President Harris has a "plan." What could that plan call for? Will she just fly off into liberal, left, loony land? Will she attempt to emulate her Boss? Will she start flying the race flag? Does she have a dream? We all recognize the glorious prase the MSM will heap upon her. The first female President, the First Minority, Female President. Is there anything she will not be allowed to get away with? If anyone questions anything she says or does, will they be tossed into the racist gulag media prison? Does anyone really think she doesn't realize this? We are talking about a person who openly had an affair with one of the most recognized, corrupt politicians in the history of California. The biggest question becomes, what will she not be able to get away with? How could she not realize the advantage she holds? Well, somehow the power behind the Democratic Party didn't see her plan, and that might be what they call in law enforcement....... " A Clue!" 

Confidence leads to Catastrophe: 

Proverb 16:18: Read it. It's where she is heading. When political leaders think they have everything going their way, that's when the really historic mistakes happen. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_basic_income

Universal Basic Income. It's a growing topic with the large city Mayors. It's a way they believe to reduce the social pressure inside their cities. It's a page right out of the socialist, communist playbook. It would be widely popular with the far left, even though Uncle Joe was against it in the past. Now, is UBI "the issue" President Harris may fall on her sword over? Most likely not, but I brought it up for one reason. With her confidence level being at levels unseen in the White House, she is bound to make a monumental mistake, one that not even her Clinton like grin / smile / will get her out of. So you see; the minute we hear, Mrs. President, the moment in time Hillary's head will explode, we need to be prepared for that cataclysmic mistake............the one she is bound to make. 

In the End: 

Everyone knows, even Uncle Joe, the statement, "Mrs. President", is coming. Vice President Harris knows it as well. The MSM will have multiple orgasms on live TV, and the Mayors of the US's dying cities will dance in the streets. Oh, by the way, did you see Portlands Mayor giving the, "It's time to united" speech?  The Teletubby Left now trying to face down the radical, violent Left. That will be entertaining to watch. Anyway, in the end, President Harris is going to have to have a plan, a plan that doesn't make Proverbs 16:18 come to fruition...........once again! What is Harris? She is the person that has every chance in the world to really ....really screw things up! Good luck Mrs. President.