OBAMA’S PARTING SHOT AGAINST THE RUSSIANS. JUST HOW DANGEROUS IS IT?

So the US administration announced pending “actions” against the Russians? Interesting they picked  to announce this event the same day Secretary of State Kerry gave a worthless lecture to Israel as his parting shot. It’s no surprise the current US administration has flown their Anti Semite Colors at the very end of their eight year run. Making the leader of a free nation and a once strong Ally enter the White House by the backdoor was the first real clues of Obama’s anti-Jewish feelings, but let me get back to the issue at hand.  

So the US is going to announce additional sanctions on the Russians? Wow! That will show them! That’s a Progressive Liberal’s way of showing just how down in the dirt they can get. Take that Tsar. Ya…. Now you know who you are messing with. Good grief!

Why did the US telegraph this event? If you truly wanted to get revenge for a cyber event, why wouldn’t you just do something and then disavow the whole issue?  Why make a media event out of it? Well, that is what the US Administration does and they are not the only ones. Domestic, political leveraging is a timeless concept carried out by just about every government in the known world. So, if we are to assume this event is more for the internal, public consumption of the US, then the Russian reaction was probably not factored into the formula. Did the Russians react? When I checked Sputnik.com. I couldn’t find a response. With the time differential, it may have been too soon or perhaps something else took place? Did the Tsar just blow off the big announcement from the US? Probably not. If “Face Saving” is the objective of the US Administration, how could they possibly believe fore even a single minute the Tsar would allow the US to make such a statement and not respond? As a matter of fact, there was a response. It was covered in Western media, but no official story on Sputnik, at least not yet.

Is this telegraphed event going to have repercussions? Will the Tsar make a point of embarrassing the outgoing US Administration one last time? I would be his response will verbally far more impressive to the world public than the announcement of yet another threat of sanctions. In the arena of verbal combat, the US is outgunned.  Will the Tsar simply move his energy towards the Trump Administration and let Obama go with a verbal slap? Well, there was a good chance of that taking place up until the stupidest statement of all was mentioned in the US’s announcement today.

“Some unannounced actions” taken is a covert manner? Several weeks ago, when this whole story of the Russians impacting the US election became the answer as to why Trump won, I wrote about how dangerous it was to threaten another nation, the Russians no less, when you had no history of backing up your statements or even worse, when the world is your audience and they wait for the response. It could be the Tsar would have been willing to just grin his typical grin and let this “announcement” pass, but then the US blew it! They had to add the unannounced slice, or at least the Administration’s version of Sputnik.com … CNN did so.

Dumb! Just dumb! After eight years as the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, you would think the Obama team would have figured this out. Just because you have a history in US politics of saying outrageous statements while the political opponent takes the ‘high ground”, doesn’t mean that theory translates into international affairs. Truly something Obama and his team never figured out. As I said weeks ago, if anything happens now………anything…….. the Tsar is in a perfect position to blame the US.

The Armature Hour in the US ends on January 20^th of 2017.

Let’s hope the Trump version of “ Zero Button” has a better impact than the last one.

Vindictiveness. A trait of many world leaders.

Let’s see how this plays out.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/28/politics/russian-election-meddling-sanctions-hacking/index.html

AMBASSADOR KARLOV’S ASSASSINATION. HOW DID IT HAPPEN?  

Behind the scene of all the political drama this assassination created, sits a very….very…concerning question. A question that everyone that has ever been in the business of keeping others safe is asking. How? How did the Assassin gain a position of such importance and trust? Simply put, how did this happen? Well, let’s take a look at just a few events that took place prior to this attack and see if they might provide any clues!

 The purge:

For over two years now, Egodan has been on a completely uncontrolled journey of dismantling the Law Enforcement agencies of Turkey. His obsession with the idea that Gulen’s followers had infiltrated almost every level of every Law Enforcement agency in Turkey is well documented. Egodan’s paranoia has no limits and after the attempted coup, well, he became clinically neurotic; as if he wasn’t already so. History has shown us that purges based on paranoia always result in dysfunctional organizations that produce even more dramatic events.

After the purge of Turkish Law Enforcement agnecies, it is very likely the surviving leadership was nearly desperate to fill the voids created by the purging actions. How well were the new “recruits” vetted? How expedited was the background process? It’s a universal fact that law enforcement agencies that attempted to quickly bring on additional members eventually suffer from the quality of the members they so quickly pushed through the process. Turkish law enforcement management not only had to try to refill the ranks of their organizations, but they had to do so with under the scrutiny of a mad man. I could go on and on about the consequences of Egodan’s actions, but the bottom line is this, Turkey’s ability to provide one of the basic tenets of a functional society, law enforcement, has been severely damage.

 The Consequences:

The consequences of Egodan’s purge mentality go far deeper than just a loss of basic, law enforcement. The Turkish military has been just rendered just as inoperable as their law enforcement partners and the world knows it. The Tsar knows this better than anyone and never forget my theory on his desire to neutralize NATO. By the way, is the Tsar willing to sacrifice an Ambassador for the sake of reaching his goal? Absolutely!

Imagine the reaction of the other countries agencies charged with protecting their diplomats when they are in Turkey? What was the reaction when they learned who the shooter was? Where is the level of trust in any other member of that Turkish security agency? Just think of the shock the good member of the Turkish Security Service had to endure. People who carry a gun for a living, people who are charged with keeping the peace and the protection of the unprotected take great pride in what they do. Honor runs deep in that part of the world and honor was ripped from the good members on that day. Trust was destroyed not because of anger, but out of necessity. Could the US State Department Security program trust anyone assigned by Turkish officials after that day? What was the damage done at the operational, partnerships level after that day?

When the Assassin decided he was going to kill the Russian Ambassador, did he contemplate the impact it would have on the organizations sworn to keep people safe? Did he truly understand the damage of trust he would create? I bet not. His motive was the motive of most Assassins, revenge! The ramifications, the increase cost of keeping others safe after this attack was never factored into his goal.

As quickly as the question of “how” could be contemplated, typically by the political leaders of the world, the reality is, most organization tasked with keeping people safe asked a different question. A question with even greater consequences. “Are there more”? That question can be framed in a different fashion. “Did he have help”? Now, most logical, normal individuals at recognized, professional agencies asked this question in a very scripted way. Finding that answer is almost a checklist process for most. Most, but not for the man who runs Turkey. If any event could drive Egodan’s paranoia deeper into the realm of irrational behavior, it would be the assassination of a Russian Diplomat in Turkey!   What action did he take after this act? What actions will he take because of this act?

The assassination of a Russian Ambassador is an extremely dangerous event. The assassination taking place in a country run by someone like Egodan, well, that makes predictive analysis nearly impossible.  I have to wonder where the Assassin’s Supervisor is. Does he have any fingernails left? Did he even have a clue? Frankly, to a man like Egodan, it doesn’t matter! 

THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR IS BURIED, BUT THE GAME CONTINUES.

I was tempted this morning to once again comment on the attacks like the one a few days ago in Germany. I would have gone down that trail, but to be honest with you, it’s an old story and a story that simply seems to never change. Yes, random acts of violence are a part of man’s nature, but try explaining that to the families of the dead. Will it ever end? Most likely not. It may change causes and it may bring about even more instability just like what we are witnessing in Europe, but in the end, man’s ability to do great harm to other defenseless, innocent people is a sickness that has plagued the Human Race from the dawn of time. How to stop this most recent round of senseless violence may make for great talking points on cable news and it may allow so called “experts” to pump out an ever increasing volume of worthless books, but it’s now going away anytime soon! The most frightening fact is this. In a world of instant communication and imagery without explanation, the repercussions of these types of events are more dangerous than at any point in history.

Okay, off the soapbox and back to what I really intended on addressing today.

Two days ago, I made this comment in a post. “So, the Turks blame the Kurds and the Russians blame the Sunni Radicals, “Terrorist”.  With both sides painting such a rosy picture of their rekindled love, it will be interesting to see whose story gets to stay the lead answer”. I knew this topic was not worthy of talking about for at least the first two days or so. I had to give the Tsar and Egodan time to shape the event to the point some hint of where this was going would become clear. Well, it looks like that event is beginning to take shape. You see, this event, unlike most, was unplanned, at least by the Tsar and Egodan. There wasn’t a page in the play book to turn to. The response was not scripted and ready to push to the media as soon as the attack took place. In the Tsar’s or Egodan’s Master Plan, the assassination of the Russian Ambassador to Turkey was not anticipated. Time. It took a time to find a way to leverage the death. Look.

The world has basically two types of leaders. The typical “Leader” watches an event unfold and then sits down with his or her most trusted advisors to figure out a way to “react” to the event. Masterful “Leaders” see an event unfold, sit down with their most trusted advisers and plot the best advantage! There is a HUGE difference between these two types of “Leaders”! One reacts and the other plots!  The Tsar and Egodan are fall into second category. The US “Leader” falls into the first.

So, after a few days of plotting, how does the Tsar and Egodan take advantage of the assassination? How do they appear to sing the same song, but yet, not alter their own plot for the region? Remember, the concept the Turks and the Russians are hand in hand is the statement of a fool! Appearance is the key ingredient for both the Tsar and Sultan; I’ve not called him that for a few weeks, so I figured it was time.

Syria and the vision of where the conflict is going, that was the “joint’ statement the Tsar and the Sultan agreed to make. They even tossed in the Persians for good measure as if they had any vote on the matter.  “This act will not change our resolve to solve the Syrian crisis”…or something like that! Again, lets’ be clear here. The “vision” of Syria for the Russians and the Turks are about as far apart as you can get and yet still act like One Team, One Fight! For the Sultan, there will be no Kurdistan. There will be an image as the Sultan being the great savior of the Sunni population in the region. For the Tsar, the payback pain for Western broken promises on NATO expansion will continue. The drive to secure the Russian frontier will not be altered by the death of one of their Ambassadors. The hand in hand walk will continue, but the paths the two Leader intend on taking are very different. At some point in time, other real leader will need to understand how to expose these two different paths. Will Trump be the first category of leader or will he show up in the second category? The West needs a few second category leaders and they need them quickly. 

RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR ATTACKED IN TURKEY. A GAME CHANGER FOR THE KURDS?

 Ambassador Karlov was reportedly shot today in Turkey. How this will impact the Russian, Tukey relationship will play out over the next few days, but both sides will have their version of what it means to them.

For the Turks, they will blame the Kurds, regardless of what factional name you may want to give them. To the Turks, the Kurds are the Kurds!

For the Russians, well, it could be a game changer. Upfront, the blame will go to the “Terrorist” the US / West supports, according to the Russians. Blaming the Kurds is harder for the Russians given the Russian support to the Kurds.  Tell the West, “look what you have done”, that is a much better message for the Tsar to pound the table with.

So, the Turks blame the Kurds and the Russians blame the Sunni Radicals, “Terrorist”.  With both sides painting such a rosy picture of their rekindled love, it will be interesting to see whose story gets to stay the lead answer.

One thing is for sure, Egodan will cease this event as yet another battle cry to move against just about any Kurdish organization you can find an acronym for.

In the last few days of the Obama administration, don’t look for anything more than, “We deplore this cowardly act and..so on….and so on…!!!

As for Trump, now that is the key. What changes to the conversation take place? The conversation on what to do with Syria and what to do about the Terrorist groups attached to the sectarian war between the Sunni and the Shia?

Finally. Look for the difference between when a US Ambassador is murdered and when one of the Tsar’s is shot. If Karlov lives or dies is not the issue. The Tsar is a man who doesn’t take such things lightly. The payback will come at some point. 

OBAMA’S THREATS TO RUSSIA…. WHY?

I must admit, I wasn’t completely shocked when I read the story of President Obama threatening action on Russia. It’s not been a good run this last term and he seems to be the kind of guy who can carry a grudge. But……But……openly threatening Russia and doing so over an issue that is weak at best, well, that’s disturbing!

At some point yesterday, someone had to inform the Tsar that the US President, a person the Tsar has absolutely no admiration for, made such a dangerous statement! The way the Tsar would have taken this message is along the lines of, “I’m going to get you….you are going to pay”! Now, to a man such as Putin, a real Killer and someone that is comfortable with aggressive action, that statement simply had to do more damage than we think. Well, perhaps!  

First thing I did late last night was scan the front page of Sputniknews.com, one of the official mouthpieces of the Tsar’s team. It was there I imagined I would find the preliminary response to the US President’s statement. How hard would that response be? That would indicate, to me, just how serious the Tsar took this threat. By this morning, it appeared the initial reaction was along the lines of, “put up or shut up”! Yep, the proverbial shoulder shrug with, “prove it”! Far too often, the smirk on Putin’s face tells the story of where his mind is. I’m willing to bet he has perfected that “smirk”.  It’s a weapon! So, what does this answer, at least the initial response, tell us about how the Tsar perceives this threat from the US? Does the Tsar take this threat seriously? Before I answer that, let me take a minute to give you a few simple rules on making threats.

Rule number one:

Don’t threaten someone or something unless you are absolutely committed to following up on the threat. The Redline incident in Syria should have been the best example for the US President on that rule.

Rule number two:

Never….EVER…threaten someone with witnesses? The average Joe on the streets of the US can go to jail for doing this and almost always, the first thing the arresting Police Officer will tell the suspect is, “You shouldn’t have said that with witnesses”! “Revenge is a dish best served cold”!

Rule number Three:

Be prepared for the counter threat! Escalation! It’s the historical pivot point just prior to nations going to war. Oh, by the way, most of these escalating events are founded in deep stubbornness or people with grudges.  

Okay, enough about the rules. How does the Tsar interpret this threat from President Obama? The initial response was, “put up or shut up”! That message is a message inside of a message. “I don’t care what you think. You don’t have the stones to pick a fight with me”! So, the good news is, if there is good news, the Tsar most likely is not intimidated by the US President’s statement.  Remember, the Tsar’s impression of Obama is more along the lines of Urkel from Family Matters. No respect and thus little fear. Yes, no respect and little fear make a dangerous cocktail! Putin also understands the days of President Obama’s influence are nearly over. I can assure you the Tsar is far more interested in the tension that is taking place between the US intelligence community and the US President Elect. The fact that this tension is based on the same issue, hacking, well, that makes things all the more interesting for the Russians. How does outgoing President Obama react? Not near as important to the Tsar as how inbound President Trump reacts.

Threats! When one nation threatens another, especially two Super Powers, it needs to be in the form of a warning. A warning that some situation, some process is and has become nearly unacceptable. Even at that point, the best execution of such threats is based upon “unofficial” communications and not in the public eye, at least not initially. Once a government has seemingly exhausted all “unofficial” avenues on an issue that creates tension, then they typically will begin the process of informing their public. A prime example of this was the Cuban Missile Crisis. As soon as President Kennedy spoke to the American people, the whole world began to stockpile food and water! Yes, the topic of nuclear weapons is far more frightening than hacking emails, but the American people didn’t even blink after President Obama’s statement! Why? Could it be the President’s own people have the same opinion of him as the Tsar? Do they simply not see the threat of stolen emails, even when the story is wrapped around the hyper inflamed topic of tampering with the US Presidential Elections as something the nation may go to war over? How far removed are the American people from the real fear of war? Not just a few buildings being knocked down by a religious movement, but war….real war? Why did the US President’s words yesterday not send everyone running to stockpile food and water? One Super Power threaten another and nether nation blinked an eye.

What’s really going on here?

To hear Fox News tell the story, this whole thing is all predicated on the fact that Hillary lost. The President and those on the Progressive, Passive left simply can’t come to terms with the idea that Trump won and that damn thing called the Electoral College has screwed them out of control for a second time in 20 yrs. By the way, how brilliant the US Founding Fathers were to put into place such a process? To hear the US Democratic Party logic, all you have to do is win California, New York and Texas and the hell with the rest of the country. Yep. Just take a look at Mexico and see what that will get you. So, is that it? Is that what this is all about? If the Progressive Left in the US can’t come to terms with the way the elections came out, do the push the nation to potential conflict with another Super Power? What else might possibly be going on here?

For well over ten years now, the stories of just how dangerous cyber-attacks could become stacked on top of government reports on how unprepared the US is for such attacks have been placed out there for all to see. Countless stories of massive theft of data, corporate secrets lost, people identify stolen and it goes on and on and on! The US has spent BILLIONS and BILLIONS on defending the nation from “cyber threats”, yet a minute doesn’t go by the nation is not attacked and not just the US but many nations throughout the world. The people of the US have been told how bad it could be and how bad it may get, but do they understand? More importantly, has the US government told the American people the “whole truth”? I happen to know part of that answer, but I will not comment. How bad is this threat becoming? How vulnerable is the US and other nations? Just like all the horror stories the talking heads have been pushing on the news networks, has the threshold been reached? Is the US government to the point they know longer feel they can govern the nation without outside influence? Isn’t that what the accusation is all about? The Russian influenced the Presidential Election? Can someone really flip a switch and turn off society in the US or the rest of the world? Ever seen the movie, Escape from L.A?

Here is the point that scares me the most. The accusation is a dangerous one. The Russians are trying to reshape government of the US. As I said the other day, not new news as it has been going on for decades. It was the baseline for the Cold War. But….but… if this is the message the President of the US is trying to give to the American people, then why did he deliver the message on MPR? Where is the, “Stand by for a special statement from the White House”?

Has the US government hidden how bad the cyber issues have become? Yes!

Has the cyber issue come to the point that two nations, that have the ability to destroy the world, may go to war? No.

The odds are this is exactly what many think it is. It’s one party in the US having a fit that they’ve lost again. But here is the dangerous part. The leader of that party and the nation has decided to blame a very paranoid, methodical world leader who has no gumption for being threatened.  

Perhaps it’s divine intervention the message of “ I’m going to get you” was delivered by Urkel and not John Wayne? 

COFFEE SHOPS AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS! WHAT’S THE LINK?

As I was reading the morning news on events in Iran, I came across this story of yet another raid on Coffee Shops in Iran. In case you didn’t know it, the government of Iran sees Coffee Shops as a key element for malcontents and troublemakers within the youth of their society. Now, here I was looking for general information on one of the more pressing topics the new US President is going to have to deal with, the Iranian Nuclear Program “deal”, but what I found was yet another Coffee Shop raid!

So, is there a connection between Coffee Shop raids in Iran and Trump’s plan for dealing with the Iranian nuclear deal? Well….yes….. or should I say, there should be. You see, it’s not new news, I’ve said that before, that two schools of thought continue on the topic of dealing with Iran. These two “schools” are the same schools that have been the center of decision making on Iran for over twenty years.

School of thought number One:

Passive support to the youth of Iran, such as the Green Party, thus setting up an Arab Spring type of event. The approach is typical of more progressive, passive government and it may have worked if not for one fatal error. An error committed by the Obama administration back in 2009. Never passively support a movement, let them know you “passively” support them and then not show up when it’s game time! That is exactly what happened to the youth of Iran in 2009 and as a consequence their leaders were rounded up and locked away. Their weapons program went into high gear and Iran’s leadership was so paranoid after the events of 2009 when the so called “Arab Spring” showed up in the region, the Iranians hardliners saw this as yet another attempt by the West to destabilize Iran. In fact, they became so convinced the Arab Spring was a Western plot, their commitment to protecting their government convinced them to go on the offenses throughout the region. Yep, some of us truly believe the Persian paranoia over the Arab Spring is a key ingredient as to why the whole region is now in turmoil. They may not watch the NFL, but they do understand, “A good Defense is best supported by a strong Offense”.

School of thought number one was a worthy concept, but the commitment to supporting the  plan must be followed through all the way to the end. Lack a staying power! Ask the Syrian resistance about Obama and this concept. The problem with Progressive, Passive foreign policy…..you can’t have that and weak knees at the same time. 

School of thought number two:

Stick your finger in your opponent’s eye and dare him to do something about it! You know, “You are with us or you are against us”!!!!! Great words at the time, but there was and always is the category of, “I don’t care and I’m not part of this” Now, before I go any further, where the Iranians implicated with the actions of OBL and 9-11? Yes! The statement about the second school of thought is made to simply show a comparison of how taking a hardline is much different than taking a soft approach and nothing more. The fact of the matter was and is, many in the West and particularly the US have an opinion that the hardline is the only line that can be taking with Iran. The reality is school of thought number two has a risk of failure! I’ve made this statement before, but here it goes again. A group inside a nation may not agree with the leadership of that nation, but let someone from the outside threaten the nation as a whole and the dynamics change and change quickly. Why do you think a seated government that is in trouble with its own population will nearly always strive to create an “outside” threat to the nation? Those kids in the Coffee Shops of Iran would love to be more Western, but not at the price of being bombed by the Western militaries. They may not support the “Hardliners”, but they do love their country and the Western track record of being able to separate the two issues is beyond poor!

Trump and the two schools of thought:

What does President Elect Trump do? Can he fined a mix, a hybrid, of the two school of thought? What does he have his team working on? When you look at his actions and some of the comments he’s made, it appears he does seem to have a little of both schools in his approach. You have to ask yourself, “Has that already been tried”? Has a mixture of the two schools been formulated? If you’ve been reading my post on Iran for the past few years, you should recall my comments about the West trying to build an alternative “leader” for Iran. I’ve been sold on the idea for several years now, knowing how some of my old comrades in arms think, of the West approaching an Iranian General and striking a “deal”.  “You assume power and we will quietly support you without making it look as if you were our Puppet”!  Sound crazy? If you know the history of the US and its Allies, you understand this model is not new.

How often does Trump use the word, “deal / deals”? They guy built an empire on making “deals”! He’s Attention Deficit / Hyper Active Disorder all the way. When his team comes to him with a series of options, the process of picking one will not take days or even hours. I’m not sure any decision he will make in the next four years will take hours. He is truly a mixture of school one and school two and as such, any plan that mixes aggressive actions with the possibility of passive support, well, that will look appealing to him. Hold on! There is at least one major flaw with this mixture concept. The Iranian leadership has anticipated this temptation concept for some time now. In a county that is ruled by paranoia, few, if any of its Generals are not suspect. For months now, I’ve watched the names of the Iranian senior leaders who have been killed in Syria and thought to myself, “I wonder if these deaths are the Iranian version of begin sent to the Western Front”? Is there someone approachable? Does the Trump team have a plan that calls for leveraging the lust for power and fame?

In the meantime, the kids inside the Coffee Shops of Iran are watched 24/7/365!  Discontent starts with those who love to hang out at Starbucks!

https://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2016/12/15/Iran-detains-120-people-in-a-coffee-shop-in-downtown-Tehran.html

RUSSIAN HACKING AND THE US ELECTIONS. SAME OLD CAR….JUST NEW PAINT.

So the Russians attempted to manipulate data to influence an event in the US? Is that earth shattering? Is this yet another example of just how devious the Tsar truly is? It makes a great news story for those reporters and listeners who have no clue how events between countries have taken place for thousands of years. Four thousand years ago, the Egyptians and the Chinese manipulated information to influence the opinions and the actions of civilian populations and the truth be known, it was probably going on even before these two great societies were established. The Spanish Inquisition. Now, there is a great example of manipulating information. Radio Free Europe! Who ran that program? What was the overall, strategic purpose? Yep. To destabilize, impact, foreign governments. Tokyo Rose….Ditto! In the 21^st century, does anyone really believe the concept is going to change? What’s the old saying,  “ Information is power”!

In 2016 and beyond, countries are going to continue to refine the weaponization of information. If most of that information is now stored on the worldwide web, then that is where the fight is going to move to, it already has. Why do you think the US and others are spending Billions of dollars on cyber operations? The fact of the matter is, everyone is doing it, but some have fewer restrictions on what their government will allow them to do and that means someone or some nation has and will have the advantage.

The story goes the Russians hacked into private emails that painted a very embarrassing picture of the Democratic Party in the US. Stop to ask yourself one question. Why would the Tsar pick Trump over Hillary Clinton? I will tell you why, because the Tsar and his government were and still are convinced that Hillary Clinton was part of an information campaign to unravel the Tsar’s government. Yep. Hillary was part of an information warfare operation. You can imagine how entertaining I found the accusations against the Russians to be. By the way, Hillary is on record stating she believed the Putin administration should be defeated! Gee, I wonder why the Tsar was out to get her.

Are there boundaries to the concept of information warfare? No. Should elections and the ability to influence elections be placed off limits? No. No, because it would never hold. What happened in the US elections cycle is nothing new. It will happen again. It will happen at the hands of the West, the East and anyone else who sees information that can further their plans.

Here is a bit of advice that I fully believe no politician can ever follow. Don’t send emails that might embarrass you or incriminate you. Did anyone happen to notice the emails that were hacked were never disputed as being factual? Yes, I know towards the end, Hillary’s camp tried to say the emails were forged, but unfortunately for her camp, the ability to show authenticity is well known. How dare someone leak emails that shows how dishonest a politician is!

It’s the 21^st century and the worldwide web, social media are only going to become more complex. The ability to communicate without someone knowing your true intentions is always going to be a risk that will have to be weighed.

In the end, this story is a few thousand years old and something tells me releasing a few emails is going to be seen as child’s play compared to what will happen in the future.