THE BATTLE FOR KIRKUK. ANOTHER CHAPTER FROM DUNE!
The long awaited battle for Kirkuk is underway. Anyone who
halfway pays attention to the region has always understood what was going to
happen. Kurdistan, or at least the attempt at Kurdistan. The dream of the
Kurds. Kurds who just might be able to have some level of unity, unity long enough
to attempt to carve out their dream. A dream the Turks, Iranians and Assad will
do anything to prevent.
Fact
check. What are the Kurds? Sunni. What are the forces now attacking Kirkuk?
Yep. Shia. Shia with Iranian
units in support. Another fact check. What side are the Russians on? If you
said both, you can continue. What side
is the US on, if you said both, you may continue to continue! Wait…..what? The US is on the side of the Shia
/ Iranians? Well, not exactly, but they are supporting
the Iraqi government and only the true idiots in DC don’t understand Iran calls
the ball in Iraq. So, yes, you get
credit if you said “both”.
Just how bad can this get?
A few
days ago, yet another ground movement was conducted by the Turks into Syria.
Does anyone think this had anything to do with anything other than the Kurds?
If so, stop. Go back to what you were doing. You just failed the course. Okay,
back to the topic. So, are the Turks working with the Iranians? Well, not
exactly. The common denominator is the quest to not see a Kurdistan continue to
develop. How that takes place is not an issue derived from any form of “joint”
operation, especially between Shia and Sunni units. Yes…. I know… there were
and in some case are “Joint” Sunni / Shia operations in Iraq. But, before you
believe some foolish concept such as a common goal, take a deeper look at the amount
of money spent on this “joint” project. Yes, they are paid to get along and yes,
they will both continue to betray each other when the time comes.
How bad
can the battle of Kirkuk get? Well, if you know anything about the Kurds, you
know the Iraqi / Iranian forces better have their share of body bags ready to
go. Yes, the Iraqi / Iranian / Hezbollah forces will make “gains” in the first
actions inside of Kirkuk. The Kurds will give up areas they don’t intend on
defending and allow the Iraqi units to spread out in an urban environment. Then
the fighting will come and if you think the ISIS units held out for an extended
period of time, pay attention to how the Kurds respond. This is a fighting
force that has had years to think about how to defend Kirkuk. So, think of
Kirkuk as Stalingrad and the Iraqi’s are the Germans. Think in terms of being
over extended and you may get a glimpse of the days and weeks ahead for Kirkuk.
Where are the Russians?
Russia.
The supporter of Assad. Russia. The supporter of Iran. Are we going to see
Russian air support for the battle of Kirkuk? No! Was a push on Kirkuk even in
the playbook for the Russians? Nope! Do the Russians support the Kurds? Go back
to the top of this post! So, what is going on here? How is the battle for
Kirkuk going to play out in Moscow? Has the Tsar placed a call to Tehran yet?
Does Tehran care if the Tsar calls? Let’s go back to a discussion I’ve had on several
occasions. What is the relationship between the Russians and Iran? Does the
Tsar get Birthday cards from Tehran? I bet not. Do the Russians see the
Persians as tool in the great quest of Mother Russia? Yes. Do the Persians see
themselves as a Puppet on a string from Moscow? No. Do they think the rest of
the world sees them that way? Yes. Does that upset them? What do you think? Do
the Persians feel as if the Russians pushed them to the sidelines on the future
of Syria? Yes. Does that upset them? Oh you bet! So does Tehran “trust” Moscow?
Trust? What a strange word when it comes to international diplomacy. Finally,
are the Iranians going to allow the future of Iraq to be decided by anyone but
Iran? No! So, where do the Russians come into play on the issue of the Kurds
and Kirkuk? Have you ever read the book Dune? “The Spice must flow”! Who is in
charge of the “Spice” is irrelevant. In Moscow, one truism is undeniable. If
properly played, there is money to be made in a conflict and if you are really
good, you make money from both sides!
The US? Where does it
stand?
As of this morning, the same
old story hold true on the so called news networks. What did Trump say or do in
the past 24hrs that everyone can argue about? Yes, the US is so lost in it’s
own politics, that it can’t see the world that is revolving around it. Even
when The Donald does attempt to address something about the rest of the world,
the first reaction is only based upon what he said and not what the event itself
actually is. Lost at Sea. That is where the US is. As a matter of fact, the US Foreign
Policy Ship has been lost at sea so long, it has to be about out of gas! Funny
thing about ships that are presumed “lost”. The people that were expecting the
cargo, simply accept the fact it’s not showing up! It so bad now, I even saw an
article last week on CNN that was encouraging Iran to “ Call the US’s Bluff on the
nuclear development “deal”. Oh, by the way. Do you know why that disaster is
called a “deal”? Well, I will tell you. Such an agreement, by US Constitutional
law is supposed to be worked as a “Treaty” not a “Deal”! Obama knew he couldn’t
get what he caved in on through Congress so he called it a “Deal” and thus,
avoided Congress. Ego’s….politics is all about egos! Back on track here! The US
“supports” the Kurds right? Well, there is another one of those funny words. “Supports”.
Back in the 90s we “supported” the Kurds and that lead them to be gassed! Is
the US going to prevent Kirkuk from becoming a battle zone? No. Has the US once
again tried to work a deal with Moscow on the issue of Kirkuk? You can bet both
sides have talked about what was coming. Did the US ask the Russians if the
Iranians were part of the discussion? Nope! Did the US care? Nope. Does the
future of the Kurds rest in the hands of the US? No. Who does hold the future
for the Kurds? Are the truly on their own? The “Spice”….be thinking in terms of
the “Spice”!
Did the Iranians force this Battle?
Short answer. Yes! What is the only thing the Iranians could
promise the Tsar that might keep him from striking yet another deal with the
US? Yep. It must flow! But wait a minute! What about the Ottomans? Has
anyone worked this deal with the Turks? Who actually controls the lines from
Kirkuk, that is until the location of the lines falls into the hands of someone
new? So, what’s in it for them? Does the fall of Kirkuk prevent the future of
Kurdistan? For the most part, yes! Is that enough to let the events in Kirkuk
unfold without Turk influence? Yep.
Yes the whole
region remains a mess. Yes, the events in Kirkuk are going to have a resounding
impacts on the Iraqi government, the Iranian government and the Turks. Yes, the
Kurds are once again pawns in the larger game of world powers. Yes, the
Russians will continue to make decisions not based on the best interest of Iran
or Turkey. Let me end by saying this. The only way a fighting force like
Peshmerga gives up Kirkuk is if something else much larger is going on. Iraqi
flags driving up and down the roads of Kirkuk is a dangerous sign. Shia vs
Sunni. If anyone has taken this reality out of the context for this event, they
are foolish. Does the Guild understand the depth of this conflict?
No comments:
Post a Comment